jactionscripters.com

Home > Winsock Error > Winsock Error 10055 Windows 2008

Winsock Error 10055 Windows 2008

Any suggestions, haven't had the need for much API integration, mostly use com controls. winapi winsock share|improve this question edited Jun 16 '11 at 6:24 Prof. Cheers OldVB6 0 Message Author Closing Comment by:OldVB62011-06-13 Issue was in a third party control, the experts help was great, but ultimately it was resolved without a specific solution from Get Started Skip Tutorial Splunk.com Documentation Splunkbase Answers Wiki Blogs Developers Sign Up Sign in FAQ Refine your search: Questions Apps Users Tags Search Home Answers ask a question Badges Tags http://jactionscripters.com/winsock-error/winsock-error-10055-server-2008.php

Join & Ask a Question Need Help in Real-Time? It creates almost 900 threads and a single thread who is operating on a socket. KDE1_STC_CANTBIND=10055 Symptom IBM Tivoli Monitoring Agent has been stopped and started numerous times, but it will not connect to the Tivoli Monitoring Enterprise Server (TEMS). Could that be something to do with this problem? 0 Message Author Comment by:OldVB62011-06-08 The data received is of varying lengths, the code always retrieves all data in the buffer. check here

Environment Windows 2000 2003 2008 Server Diagnosing the problem Message found in the Agent log: (4EC4F3AC.0006-7B4:kdebbbi.c,64,"KDEB_BaseBind") Status 1DE00000=KDE1_STC_CANTBIND=10055: An operation on a socket could not be performed because the system lacked so far i only knew using winsock control. Falken 13.7k766117 asked Jun 16 '11 at 6:21 pjain 4491720 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 1 down vote I think, it's impossible to say mo

Will just have to keep experimenting, will be looking closer at the class module api calls and see if I can purge the buffer manually...... 0 Message Accepted Solution by:OldVB62011-06-13 Document information More support for: Tivoli OMEGAMON XE for Distributed Systems Windows Software version: 06.2.2.0, 06.2.3.0, 06.2.3.1 Operating system(s): Windows Reference #: 1597067 Modified date: 23 November 2015 Site availability Site Moving from reference counting to garbage collection. share|improve this answer edited Jun 19 '11 at 19:55 answered Jun 18 '11 at 5:57 selbie 35.7k64287 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log

It happened when the broadcasting application was on a laptop which went to sleep and was woken up. If this is the case I would suggest to use wisock Windows API instead of winsock VB control. 0 Message Author Comment by:OldVB62011-06-05 Currently testing a version of the app I recall reading an article linked off of Stack Overflow that buffers you post for pending IOCP operations are setup such that the operating system WILL NOT let the memory swap This quick tutorial will help you get started with key features to help you find the answers you need.

Have you tested the application in Windows 2003 x64 or Windows 2008? However, this proximate cause may not be the root cause since the nonpaged pool exhaustion may be due to a nonpaged pool leak. Very frustrating, although ultimately the hardware is forcing the situation. This can be monitored by watching netstat or perfmon and can be changed with the MaxUserPort registry parameter.

Get 1:1 Help Now Advertise Here Enjoyed your answer? My guess is that same type of problem could easily be recreated in a virtual environment that is starved for ram. Then, we started to have issues of accessing to Splunkweb with "500 Internal server error" a few times a week. After almost 17-20 hours of testing, I get 10055 socket error while sending the data.

Really surprised there isn't a way to clear the buffer maually.. 0 LVL 15 Overall: Level 15 Visual Basic Classic 3 Programming Languages-Other 2 Message Active 2 days ago Expert click site A more fundamental troubleshooting question is quite simply - what is different with your production environment? Why is this C++ code faster than assembly? share|improve this answer answered Nov 10 '15 at 14:41 Simon Cox 1 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google

Positional Bathroom Etiquette Why can't the second fundamental theorem of calculus be proved in just two lines? Privacy Policy Site Map Support Terms of Use Register Help Remember Me? windows-server-2003 share|improve this question edited Jun 27 '12 at 14:54 asked Jun 15 '12 at 22:52 Tom Kerr 7617 I'd say that the NIC or driver could contribute to news Since perfmon's interval is 1sec, you could have microbursts that come and go within that window.

Covered by US Patent. It's a C++ application which I had compiled with Visual Studio environment. Browse other questions tagged windows-server-2003 or ask your own question.

Chances of running out of memory are high.

Open TCP connections looks low and I am unaware of another way to monitor ports. If you write a tight loop doing async sends on a single socket, with no throttling, you can hit this very quickly. Group list elements using second list What's this I hear about First Edition Unix being restored? Resolving the problem Re boot the Windows server.

Login. more hot questions question feed default about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation It's a quad core system with 4 GiB of RAM and this application occupies around 30-40% CPU (on all 4 CPUs) in all of its running. More about the author There is somewhat subjective evidence that this isn't the problem however.

Why are you doing this anyway? Answer by Masa [Splunk] ♦ Jan 25, 2013 at 05:38 PM Comment 10 |10000 characters needed characters left Your answer Attachments: Up to 2 attachments (including images) can be used with The time now is 06:36 PM. Forum New Posts FAQ Calendar Forum Actions Mark Forums Read Quick Links Today's Posts View Site Leaders What's New?

In general, you'd want to avoid this configuration for avoiding NPP problems. (reference) We have source to one application. Thanks gplana and satsumo, great info and advice. The basic situation is that the other side of the connection says that it has closed the connection due to errors with 10055 as the code. Does the status update process create new sockets every time?

The paged and nonpaged pools are areas of memory for certain Windows kernel-mode allocations such as the Windows kernel itself (e.g. Not the answer you're looking for? There is absolutely new driver architecture and way better networking scalability. http://kbase.pscs.co.uk/index.php?article=93 https://wiki.pscs.co.uk/how_to:10055 share|improve this answer edited Jul 26 at 20:32 escape-llc 9591922 answered Jun 16 '11 at 6:27 Anton Semenov 4,00932359 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote I have

I'm downvoting this post because: * This will be publicly posted as a comment to help the poster and Splunk community learn more and improve. There also appears to be a PoolUsageMaximum value that controls when the memory manager starts to trim processes which may default to 80%. Also ensure you are getting all data received by any socket, because if you don't get it, the buffer for that winsock will grow until its limit, which seems to be Also try to use 2008 R2 or 7. –Andrew Smith Jun 23 '12 at 17:32 Concur with the idea on bad drivers, and with different hardware, it would make

Achieve same random number sequence on different OS with same seed Why does Wolfram Alpha say the roots of a cubic involve square roots of negative numbers, when all three roots